Altitude

It's actually worse than what most people think because most people think, if I don't see the lines, it's a no spray day. Ah, but the truth, these chemicals are still getting dumped into the stratosphere. I've always said the truth is scarier than fiction. Geo engineers said they only needed 14 planes of geo engineer the whole planet. But we're ignoring 42 million flights per year, but I 2050 that's expected to double. So the only reason they abandoned climate change, because it was a way to control people, is because now they have AI. And now climate change ain't so bad, even Bill Gates said, you know what climate change is not so bad, we're not going to die. Because they found a better way to control people. True. Welcome to today's episode, which is a special new down the rabbit hole episode, part of decentralized TV that has a little bit different format. So Todd tells us about what does it mean when we have a down the rabbit hole episode? It means it's an episode that isn't necessarily dedicated to decentralized living. But Mano Man is the guest interesting. And, you know, we needed to create a category to where that we could keep it, keep everyone interested in. And I'm just excited as heck. This is going to be fun because now we can, you know, break out of the just decentralized living and bring a lot of guests and topics and ideas to the table. That I think people are going to love. Yeah, well said. I would also add that this interview may not be as practical as what we normally do. And also as a disclaimer, there may be points that are presented that Todd and I don't agree with. And that's totally okay. But we think overall, the content is worth your time and attention to consider. So enjoy this episode of decentralized TV down the rabbit hole. Welcome to today's episode of decentralized TV down the rabbit hole. And I'm Mike Adams, the founder of decentralized TV with my co-host Todd Pitner from the Great State of Florida. Welcome, Todd. Mike, great seeing you. I know you've had quite the week with your voice. And I just wanted to give you a little bit of insight, just a little bit of Todd coaching. You know, because I am your senior, right? I'm a few years older than you. But when you when you're practicing the fire blowing and breathing. You don't inhale. You exhale. Oh, man. No, it was so funny. I mean, my voice is mostly recovered now. But I made the dumbest mistake for somebody who knows about nutrition. I'm growing lob lollipine trees. I'm growing them. They have pine needles that have shakimic acid, which is the perfect. You just make pine needle tea. And yet I was, I attended an event. Somebody was shedding all over me. And I wasn't the only one who got impacted. And I just let it go for a few days, unwisely. I should have been drinking the pine needle tea. When I finally did, because my voice was getting wrecked, then things started to turn around immediately. But it was the dumbest, new mistake is to grow your own medicine and walk right past it and not use it. And I'm guilty of it. That's just what happened. You know what Mike, on your broadcast recently, I thought you were going to say, you made the biggest mistake of actually attending this event. I don't know if it's people's laundry detergent, combine with spike protein, vaccine, or whatever. But it didn't, it didn't, it didn't sound a lot better than when I first heard your voice. Yeah, yeah. I feel great. I'm just waiting for the voice to recover. In the meantime, we've got an amazing guest coming on. I want to get right to him, because he is an expert in so many things, but one of them is weaponization of the atmosphere, geoengineering and how these systems are being turned against us through things like engineered famine and so much more. So how about Todd, once you bring him in? Yeah, Jim, Jim Lee, how are you? Welcome, welcome to the show. I recommended that you come on, because as many people know, I installed a food forest in my backyard three years ago. And this past January, there was definitely a Tampa Florida weather engineered weather modification event. It doesn't stay 25, 27 degrees in Florida for two weeks straight. So I, and that man, they were spraying like crazy. So I installed, we did, we did a whole episode on it. Mike and I did, I installed a very, very unique device in my, my back property that literally right before my eyes, it busted up the Kim trails. And it has been blue skies ever since. So this is a topic that very much interests me. And I couldn't be more excited to have you on the show, because when I started going down this weather modification, rabbit hole, there you were. And then there's climateviewer.com. And man, oh man, people, you can spend a decade just listening to Jim, just talk about all of this. Well, I'm pretty sure that Bill Hillm Reich would be very proud of you for installing that in your backyard. Yeah, the history of weather control. You know, it really, it's amazing to me that when I started this about two decades ago, the internet was still, you know, social media, but it had just been born. There was a lack of information. And originally, I just started out to prove to the moderators on the Google Earth community that I wasn't crazy for mapping out weather modification projects. And that really started the ball rolling into just archiving everything I could find and learn about the topic. You know, from mapping it on climateviewer.org to like in 2015 creating weather modification history.com, you know, it's 850 newspaper articles from the 1800s to present. 180 timeline entries with all the references available for each event. And about 1100 weather modification in climate engineering patterns in a searchable database. So, you know, I've done a lot of homework. And when I do my homework, I want to make sure that it's available to the public. So, everything that I've done, you know, I'm a program, I'm a graphic artist. I coded these websites myself so that you don't have to listen to this redneck from Sumpter, South Carolina talked to you. I had nausea about this. If you're interested in the topic, you can go to my website and spend like you said in the next five years reading and learning more at your own pace. And I think that that's been probably the best thing that I've done. You know, over these two decades is compiling all this information in a place and then making it palatable easy to access. So that people can understand how complex this topic is. How where the nuances, where the dangers are. Understand the technology and the people behind it. What their motives are. And that's kind of where I come at it from. Well, real quick, Mike, I just wanted to correct myself. I said, Clement, if you were dot com, is it dot ordered? It's both cloud your dot com originally. I created that in 2012. I had a blog before that. But honestly, I had really, I didn't just eat the red, you know, pill. I drank the whole bottle. So I ended up deleting 400 articles that I had written on a previous blog and starting from scratch in 2012 with climatebeard.com, which was a painful experience. But I had realized that I was under the influence of something called slave speak. And I didn't understand how people could use science fiction. That's 70% science and 30% BS to really skew my view of the world. And once I realized what these manipulating words were, I was able to go back and read my own articles in disgust. And I said, you know what, this is, this is not up to par. I got to, I just got to start from scratch. And that's what I did. It's a climatebeard.com is my blog. That's my original home page. And from there, I've made a map. Climatebeard 3D, which is on climatebeard.org with a multiplication history dot com. I just recently created KimTrailFacts.com. It's only 5% done, so don't judge me if you go there. It'll eventually be as large, if not larger than weather modification history dot com. And this is just something I love to do. You know, I'm a creative type and I remember everything I read. So I was, well, put it down so other people can read it. Jim, this is awesome. It's so great to have you on the show and to be able to meet you here. It seems like this is long overdue, actually. We should have connected with you sooner. So Todd, thank you so much for making this connection. But what I want to ask you is that until, let's say, the last five years, the very idea that some governments or some entities in the world would be weaponizing the weather for some nefarious purpose. That was considered a very fringe out there kind of idea. But not so much these days. In the post-COVID era, a lot of people realize that things were weaponized against humanity. And then today, you look at governments, even the US government. And you see that everything that can be weaponized is being weaponized. You know, the banking system, right? The dollar regulatory, you know, controls by the EPA, this and that. So can you tell us, tell our audience about what has changed in the time that you have been looking at this? And are you seeing now that it's much easier for people to understand that this is a very real thing. That's a very real thing that's happening. And it's not just some science fiction. So you really have to, you know, those who forget the past are doomed to repeat it. And what really shocked me was that, you know, I was born in 1976. In 1976, the United Nations signed a environmental modification convention treaty. This was a weather warfare ban in 1976. Now, of course, I had to do some backtracking to figure out how do we get here. Jack Anderson walks into Lyndon Johnson's Oval Office. He's a note on his desk in East. And it says something about continuing operation, papa, plus, you know, weather modification overlails. And he ends up publishing that in the Pentagon papers. And Jack Anderson, if you don't know, everybody said this CIA was trying to kill him because of watergate. I think it might have had something to do with the fact that the CIA, the US Air Force and the US Navy out of China Lake, California. They were doing weather warfare over Vietnam for five years. And this was run through a individual at the Pentagon called SACSA, we won't get too deep into the weeds here. But eventually, this was published in the New York Times. And once it became public in 1972, basically Congress was full with a bunch of old bald white men who are going, wait a minute. We can control the weather. I can only imagine the shock that this hits the New York Times that we were doing weather warfare. The slogan was, make mud not war. You know, because a play on the hippies make love not war. The idea was to flood out the Ho Chi Minh Trail to make it impossible for the Vietnam. But enhancing the monsoon rains. And they were using silver iodide and lead iodide. Wow, something that most people don't know even to this day. People throw around an operation, pop out, project, pop out all the time. They don't really know all the details. I love, I'm in the deets. That's where I love to live. So interestingly enough, the CIA ran this joint program with two branches of the military and not even the Secretary of Defense knew that it was going on. In fact, he testified in Congress that he had no knowledge that it was even happening. So flash forward, the United Nations banned this thing. They make it extremely weak. Like they do with anything. Because we passed a limited test band treaty to banned operatives here. New nuclear explosions after like Operation Starfish Prime, Hard Tech T. Then the Russians did project K. So they were trying to blow up the ionosphere and nuclear bombs. They said, you know what, maybe we should stop. But when they passed that band, they actually created a way to know if somebody was breaking the band. It doesn't matter if murder is illegal, if there's no way to catch or punish somebody that murders people. Correct? So they created the comprehensive test band treaty organization in the International Monitoring System, which is a bunch of seismographs and infrasounder quarters. So that they can listen for the sound of a new going off and know that somebody violated the treaty. The problem with N-mod is they never created a way to catch somebody doing weather warfare. So since 1976, there has been a band on weather warfare, but there's been no way to catch anybody doing it. So that's your number one point you need to focus on. Number two, China Lake, California, the US Navy Warfare Center. They also weaponized Project Storm Fury, which was a hurricane modification project by Noah. This is going on during the 60s and 70s. And during that time, they were trying to steer hurricanes into Cuba to destroy Castro's sugar crops. They were also creating drought with cloud seating. Now this is something that seems kind of backwards. You just said, you make it rain, you make floods with cloud seating. Well, you can also make a drought with cloud seating. This is called over seating. This is when you put too many particles in the sky and there's not enough water vapor. Or you cause all of the water in the clouds to rain out in one location so that when they pass over the island of Cuba, they're dry. And that's exactly what the CIA did to Cuba. They were cloud seating in the Gulf of America. I love saying that. And to make, you know, basically they called it a rain embargo. And this is documented in newspaper articles as well as firsthand accounts. But we don't to this day. We don't even know the name of that project. Wasn't this more recently also with Iran? We're exactly where I was going to go next. So your read, we're sinking up here. So then in 2010, Mark Mood Ahmed in a job. He said that European countries were stealing Iran's rain. Okay. And then he said it again in 2011 and in 2012 in front of the United Nations. Flash forward to 2018, Brigadier General Golom Jalali, an Iranian. I don't know if he's already our GC or he's a general from Iran. He said Israel is stealing our clouds. But the next year he said Israel and other surrounding countries are making our clouds barren. And then finally I believe it was 2021. He said Israel and the United Arab Emirates are stealing our clouds. Now, I think we all remember the Dubai floods that occurred. Yeah. And it seemed to me like payback because when I looked at the weather system that came through there, it's going east of west right across the straight of Hormuz into Dubai. And would you put it past the Iranians to dump a bunch of clouds eating materials into an already an atmospheric river already headed towards Dubai? I don't know. At the end of the day, the thing is you can never say for certain. And there are so many people that speak with certainty. And I never speak with certainty because I know that we cannot prove these things. And that is the problem. We know that the technology exists. We know that the history of weather warfare exists. We know that the ability to do these things and then the various purposes. The clandestine operations. They have happened. They probably are going on today. It's proving it in a court of law that's the tough part. But Jim, I'm sorry to interrupt, but about Iran, what was so notable about that was, you know, the city of Tehran was almost on the verge of having to be evacuated because of the drought was so severe. And yet then after Iranian drones destroyed that US radar installation. And I think that was in the UAE, but I'm maybe I'm not sure. Yeah, after that, I think it was a billion dollar radar installation that was supposed to be a military radar. Maybe it was dual purpose because after that, then the rains, the natural rains came to Iran. Like they used to. Does that strike you as, you know, some supporting evidence anyway? See, here's where I get highly disagreeable. When I hear these claims, then I immediately go, it is this possible. And, you know, I can hold to opposing thoughts and I can juggle until I finally go, you know what this hands have here. And when I looked into the radars that were actually destroyed, they were both what are called an A&TPY2. This is an X band radar. It's part of the third system. These are forward, um, launching missiles. Basically, the idea of the cold war was we would point big radars at the sky, face to rate radars, and see the ICBMs coming in on the way down. And then we would try to shoot them down before they hit the ground. With that, they turned that on a TED. Um, the A&TPY2 is an X band radar with a 3000 mile radius. Wow, and it can literally, if you parked one of these in Los Angeles, California, and you threw a baseball into space from Washington, D.C. It could track that ball into space up to closer like 12,000 miles. Not only track the baseball, but tell you which way the baseball was spinning. That's how accurate these are. Now, the obvious next question is, does it have the power requirements or frequency requirements to actually interact with weather? The problem is, no, it doesn't. It's X band. So it's non-ionizing radiation. This is something that, you know, I constantly, you know, get into fights with people all the time, because I'm like, you don't understand, you know, RF, um, the way it interacts with weather. And I, and this is where I, I firmly land before I make this form. Let me go to this. I think the more plausible reason why the range returned to Iran is because just like at the Battle of Antitum, Blackpowder rifles were being shot, both sides of the field. Boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom. And all of that blackpowder raised up in the air. And after the, the valley was filled with blood, it rained on the field. And that is because all of that, so it all that blackpowder that black carbon is an excellent cloud condensation nuclei. So if you're dropping bunker busters, which are going into red clay dirt, which is aluminum silicate, then you're putting a lot of black carbon, so it an aluminum into the sky, which acts as a great cloud condensation nuclei. I think that that's the more plausible scenario that between burning fuel tankers, burning, you know, military boats, you know, bunker buster bombs, and all of that that you just had such a plethora of, you know, cloud seeds available to reef, you know, to dump a lot of rain. And, you know, plus it's kind of hard to keep your weather warfare thing going on whenever all of it. It's drones going to and for who knows. But as far as the X band radar, I just, this is where I firmly land on the radar thing. There has never been one single documented case, aside from cloud ionizers and laser beams of an electromagnetic frequency altering the weather. And I, and I say this, knowing people like David miles from used to be acquiesce and miles on research and atmospheric is now as company. He claimed that he could do this. I said, show me the equipment. You never would. Climate control global trading LLC out of Dubai, they wanted to hire me to, you know, pump, pump their tech. They said that they could stop storms and do all kinds of things with radars. I said, show me the tech. Let me talk to your Russian scientist. How do you know he was Russian? We had a zoom call show me your tech. They can't do it. There has never been a single peer reviewed published not even peer reviewed published paper on modifying the weather with an electromagnetic frequency other than lasers and cloud ionizers. And both of them work on the process of ionization. So non ionizing radiation has almost no effect on the weather because the sky is a river. And we have entropy to deal with the inverse square law. It's very complicated. But it's not sexy. So like, I don't go for the sexy. I never tell people what they want to hear. I just tell them the truth based on what I've been able to learn and the entire history of weather control. Nobody's ever done it. Not even once. And the same thing is true with like Thomas Beardon. People talk about scalar waves all the time. Nobody in the history of man has ever demonstrated a scalar wave. Not once. Not one longitudinal wave ever in the history of man and the reason I say this is because if somebody did with the amount of money that goes into the weather modification business. If somebody did there'd be an Elon Musk type dude out there going, I have pioneered a new way to control the weather and the United Arab Emirates rainfall enhancement program would throw money at them. If you make it rain on them, they will make it rain on you. So that's where I come at it from. Okay, that's anything. What do you think? Well, no, that's really interesting. I completely agree with you on the so called scalar waves. I always hear people talking about scalar waves. I'm like, what are you talking about? What are your scalar waves? And they never really have a good answer on that. But on the ionization. Now remember, I run a mass spec lab and we we have an ionizing element in front of our ICP. And so we have a RF generator there that ionizes a stream of liquid. It takes a tremendous amount of energy as you will know obviously. So tiny plate. Yeah, exactly exactly. So my question to you is I completely agree with what you just said about typical x band radar. Doesn't have the energy density per square or cubic centimeter. Let's say to cause the ionization of the typical atmospheric vapor for example. But with high enough energy, if that were to be applied, you know, I can ionize lots of things. But you said lasers. You understand that. That can work. Right. So is it really just a spectrum of how much energy is being concentrated into a small area. You said you said the word power density power. This is where people get lost. You know, so they say like next rag can control the weather. Well, next rag is about a million watts. Let's be generous. Let's say it's a million and a half watts peak. Well, what's the effective radiated power? The effective radiated power is power and times DB gain the sensitivity of the radar. So 32 gigawatts. I'm going to throw that out there. 32 billion watts according to the government website. All right. That sounds like a whole lot. Okay. But the problem is you then have to figure out something called the duty cycle. The duty cycle. How often right on. So now it's all that times 0.04. It's cycling. It's cycling. Yeah. It's cycling. Yeah. It's clicking on and off. How often is it clicking on and off. Well, the duty cycle of a W S R 88 D X red on Doppler radar is 0.04, which means now that million watts just turned into 1,400 watts. And it's been spread out in a 3D space, right, which is it's all in and in the laws of entropy of plot. We have a fluid medium, which is moving. So you're not cooking the same spot. Good point. It's not it's not it's not static. It's constantly flowing. So if you were to take a blowtorch lighter and a very small stream, let's say the stream was about this wide and you made like a PVC pipe and you just heated that thing. Would you actually heat all the water you wouldn't because the water is still flowing. So the water you just warmed is now going down here and it's cooling and new waters coming in. And that's what's happening with radars. So people focus a lot on this because, you know, and it started. I'd say circa 2010 with Dutch sense really popularized the harbouring idea. And in no shade, Dutch, don't get mad. You know, we've been through this break. But at the end of the day, that stuff I think really distracts and detracts from the arguments that would lead to solutions. And that's where I really take, I take arms against, you know, people who make these claims with such certainty. Because what they're actually doing is they're distracting from companies like startup solutions and Israeli startup that's talking about geo engineering and dumping chemicals by 2030. And they want to be a government contractor. They have 60 million dollars worth of venture capital. You should be concerned about startup solutions and stop talking so much about next rad. These are the kinds of things where I go, at least to my audience. And that's why they respect me because I give it to them straight. I say, look, and I've had multiple people come on to try to debate me about this. And I'm saying, I'm willing to be wrong, but you're going to have to come with the evidence. And if you come with the evidence and you can convince me, guess what, I'm going to convince everybody else. But that you have to be open to the possibility that you are wrong and I always am. Yeah, and also I should mention to sunlight energy alone is probably orders of magnitude larger than the radar energy that's impacting any cubic area. Excellent point. So, and this is exactly what I say to people when they say that next rad and we have a mutual friend. Let's just say that. And he says the next rads are steering hurricanes and I say, well, that's interesting because the sign is about 1300 watts per meter square at the ground level. Okay, the next rad is barely breaking 96 watts per meter square. If it, if you, if you, if you stop, if you were like staring it in the face in the dangers on where it says humans don't go here, you're going to fry your brain. It's about 96 watts per meter square. A hurricane is 10 to the 16 joules per second. So we're talking about 10 quadrillion watt per meter square of kinetic energy. Yeah, so you're, you mean to tell me that firmly, Connecticut, anyway, you can imagine that this next rad is going to somehow impact that that's like going up to a bear with a toothpick and going, I'm going to kill the bear with the toothpick. Watch me move it. The bear's just going to run you over. So the scale matters and I don't think that people really, you know, they take and that's why I say I was guilty of it too. When I started out, I wanted to prove to everybody that the next rads were steering the weather because I thought that was cool. So I went and I mapped out every Doppler radar in North America. And then I watched the weather every single day and you know what I saw, I never saw a single cloud changed directions. And I was like, maybe I'm wrong here and same thing with heart. I watched heart every single time it was on a ham radio operators who are friends of mine. You can tune into 2.8 to 10 megahertz. You can listen to harp when it's on now they announced when it's on before when the US Air Force and US Navy was doing it. We had to all, you know, get together and say, oh, harp's on now. But every time harp would come on, we would monitor everything from temperature, humidity, visual satellite observations. I wanted to be that guy that caught the smoking gun evident. I spent three years of my damn life trying to get a video of harp cooking the weather and it never happened. Every single time it came on there was nothing. I mean, absolutely not one meteorological data point that I could go, you know what this 3.6 million watt 5 billion watt effective radio power 72 foot tall antennas with 180 of them and no weather ever changed. So I started to refocus myself like I said, and what I've come to the realization is that it was It was a Vincent Schaefer Irving Langmire and Bernard Vonnegut who invented cloud seating in 1946 at the General Electric Labs. Irving Langmire said that one milligram of silver eye diet under optimum conditions releases as much heat energy as one atomic bomb. So let's compare the two. Wait, wait, wait a second. I'm sorry interrupt, but so I think from what you're saying that cloud seating is the primary method by which rainfall is is cause right now, you know, and I know they're using drones for this right now, at least I've seen a lot of reports of that silver eye I've heard before of ratios of one milligram of silver eye diet unleashing a certain volume of water. I've heard those ratios before, but I've never heard what you're talking about a thermal relationship, so I'm a little bit, can you explain that a little bit more. Yeah, if you're giving me just a second, I'll show you. Okay, this is better, right? So and this kind of blew my mind when I when I heard it because I was like, that can't be true, that just can't be true, but um, and here I'll see if I can share screen real quick some requests. Okay, yeah, let's turn on the screen share. Is it okay, once you share your screen, we may have to reconfigure the the layout here, so just stand by. All right, so okay, yeah, we're seeing we're seeing your screen, we're seeing a man there we go. That is Irving Langmire, whether as a weapon and he said that was wrong, it wasn't one it was 30 in the amount of energy liberated the effect of 30 milligrams of silver eye diet under optimum conditions equals that of one atomic bomb. Now, what's he describing then re-talking about or the amount of latent energy, the heat that is generated by the chemical reaction between silver salt and water. That's what he's talking about, so the chemical reaction that occurs produces enough heat for that that doesn't make sense. It doesn't make sense, but what was the guy name? The father of weaponized weather was on Alex Jen's. Gosh, I'm drawing, I never draw a blank anyway, this is Vincent Shader, so this is just an example of, you know, stuff from weather modification history and then the original G scientist called snow to form in cloud, but they actually ended up causing floods. Lane Air Force for floods. This is Irving Langmire saying that yes, at Almagordo, they actually finally, I told them they must stop things are getting serious. We stopped on July 2nd on July 7th, but flood about devastated Omaha. This is the guy who invented cloud seating saying, yes, we, we damn near destroyed Omaha and we're doing it at Almagordo, New Mexico. And similarly, this is Vincent Shader saying cloud seating cause of U.S. floods is 1961. Yeah. So the point I'm trying to make here is, and I'm gonna pop out of the share, that when you, when you talk about like even with hurricane modification, in 2008, the Department of Homeland Security did a hurricane modification workshop. This was following Katrina in 2005. So the Obama administration got with Bill Gates, Ken called there, and the three horsemen of apocalypse who invented geoengineering, let's see, it was a, wow, I'm doing it again. So the, the knuckleheads from Lawrence Livermore National Lab, Dr. Evil, and his, these, these group of people all met together and made a bunch of hurricane modification patents in January, like right at New Year's Eve. I think they had a party together, Nathan Mervehold Patentrol was with Bill Gates and he had a whole bunch of geoengineers in the room, so they all came with the idea to steer hurricane. So let's stop the next Katrina, but in those, in those hurricane patents, it said something that was pretty disturbing. Why don't we inform a party that a hurricane is going to do X amount of damage, get a payment from them and steer the hurricane another way. So what, this is like, so, so this is going to be an auction, whoever pays the most money. Avoid the damage. This is disaster capitalism on the U.S. patent office. You can read it. It's, it's on weather modification history dot com. So the poor people get drowned out, but it's basically about that. Texas oil company says, you know what, I don't want the hurricane to hit me poor people in and in New Orleans, they get wrecked. Right. You know, that's basically, you know, weather for higher. And of course, in 2012, I was debating King called there on this. I said, dude, you guys are sick. Like, you claim like you're like these benevolent force for, you know, saving us from a climate change, but in reality, you're out here monetizing, steering hurricane. And he's like, oh, you know, we've already said that any money we made from that. We would donate the charity. I'm like, yeah, right, but now that you've been caught and we're saying this in public on your forum, you would say that. And asshole would say, anyway, so the department homeland security in 2008 had a hurricane modification workshop in Boulder, Colorado. And at that conference, they, you know, scientists came with their best ideas. How can we steer or mitigate a hurricane? And guess what? All of them, like all, but maybe one, which was cloud ionization, all of them were chemical. Because they've always been chemical from Project Serious, the Project Storm Fury to the Department of Homeland Security in 2008, it's always been chemicals. And carbon black dust has been one of the secret chemicals that most people never even heard of. In 1958, Florence van Stratton was able to create clouds on demand by just dumping liquid filled carbon black dust or just big bags of powder carbon black dust out the back of the plane. So, you know, it's used to able to make Kim trails, big stripes of Serious clouds on demand in 1958. In 1974, William Gray wrote a paper called carbon dust absorption of solar radiation. And the idea was, if you dump this black material into a hurricane, because it's black, it absorbs that 1,300 watts per meter square to the sign. Anybody who's ever set their bare ass on a black hood of a car during the summer knows that will burn your butt cheeks. And that is because it absorbs all waves of light radiation. So, the idea of using carbon black dust in a hurricane goes back to 1974. Well, at this hurricane modification workshop, Dr. Mosh Alamaro from MIT University said, Why don't we use carbon black aerosol to steer hurricanes? And that was, you know, just a regurgitation of things that have been proposed in the past. And in addition to that, I have three foias from one from the US Air Force to two from the US Navy, which mentioned carbon black dust by name in them. These are Freedom of Information Act requests done by the Sunshine Project.org, which was deleted from the internet. I found it on our cab.org. Finally, last point to putting your hat. During the owning the weather in 2025 documents that were published by the US Air Force Academy, there's a timeline on that sucker. And in it, it says, from 19, it was published in 1995 and 96. And it says 2005 technologies to be developed by the Department of Defense. CBD and I ain't talked about cannabinoid oil. It said carbon black dust. Well, 2005, the two foias I have are from 1994. There's literally the year before that was published says to be developed by 2005. What happened in 2005? Yeah, Katrina happened in 2005. It's coincidental AF. Last point I would make is this. On the whole hurricane weirdness, I'm going to throw my tent full head on and I'm going to give you one that most people haven't heard. Since that 2005 Katrina, there was a 10 year hurricane drought. Look it up. Still on Google. They were talking all about it. No major hurricane made landfall for 10 years straight until Donald Trump came into office. What did you do on day one? Can't tell the Paris climate accord. And who likes to steer hurricanes and mess with the weather? Climate scientists. So what happened that year? Three freaking big old hurricanes hit all us red necks in the southeast in the same year. Coincidence weather warfare payback. I don't know. But that's the problem with there being no verification regime for geoengineering for weather warfare. For any of this, it's all intentionally that way. Hey, Jim. First of all, I just want to say that I miss a good old days when the only thing falling from the sky was bird poop. And I just kind of want to officially, if somebody is managing the weather, I'd like to file a complaint about Florida humidity. And speaking of Florida, the Florida Legislator passed SB56 in 2025, repealing weather modification permitting and prohibiting atmospheric releases, intending to affect weather temperature climate or sunlight intensity. Now, I live in Florida. I have discerning ice and I call bullshit. The law is simply political theater symbolic nonsense. Look, Jim, I don't need all the answers. I just need someone to explain why the sky suddenly has more activity than my neighborhood face book group. How do we scientifically debunk the alleged ban? Because I see it, Jim. There's no ban over Florida. So this is, this is where, you know, like, this is probably the most controversial topic that I talk about is you know, McCam trails. And you know, I've looked at 20 years of people making claims about Kim trails. And here's, here's the rub. Banning weather modification in geo engineering is a good thing. Can you actually enforce it? Can you enforce banning cloud seating? Yes. In fact, you know, multiple states, Texas is probably the best example of it has the most cloud seating projects of just about anywhere. They have the Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation, TDLR, not TLDR. And they actually, you have to get a license from the state in order to do it. Otherwise, you're breaking the law and they've been doing that forever. So I said to representative money for it from Tennessee when he passed the first legislation in the nation banning weather modification geo engineering. I like what you're doing. It's not going to change the trails in the sky. And nobody wanted to listen. So then I proceeded to go on to Twitter, which eventually became X. And I started to tell everybody, um, the Kim trails are going to stop for the next two days, but on Thursday, the Kim trails will be back in force in Tennessee, and of course, people were freaking out going, like, how the hell did he know that? How can you predict the Kim trails? So the same thing happened, you know, I'm hanging out with, um, I don't want to name drop, but I'm hanging out with the people that were behind SB 56. And I'm trying to warn them about what happened in Tennessee. Because in Tennessee, after people, you know, the Hobion turned into copion, and then they realized they, you know, they thought they were going to see all of the sky just suddenly turned blue. That we banned the thing that we told that those stripes in the sky were geo engineering and weather modification. It's banned. Why are they still here? Now people started threatening the department of environmental protection, GEP and Tennessee. They had to move the government workers out of their building and put them into protective custody, because my Kim trails. So, same thing happens in Florida. They banned the cloud season. They banned the weather modification. Geo engineering. Now, I made a prediction when Monty Fritz did this, I said, you know, other states are going to do this, and this is good. But I'm willing to bet my left testicle that nobody west of the Mississippi will ever ban cloud seeding. And the reason why is simple. There hasn't been cloud seeding east of the Mississippi since like the 1980s and before that, the 1960s. Because we don't need it. That's the east of the Mississippi River west of the Mississippi River project sky water. I mean, funded by the US, we're a reclamation ground-based cloud seeding generators cover the entire Rocky Mountains. Idaho power company runs all the cloud seeding generators in Idaho. In Sacramento, the municipal utility district runs the cloud seeding operations. If you pay your water bill in Sacramento, or let's say Mount Shasta, I'm not going to say any names here. But I told Mount Shasta guy, hey, if you don't like weather modification, maybe you should go down to the Sacramento municipal utility district until them stop. You could even organize a protest. You're never going to stop it out there because people aren't focused on that. They're focused on the lines in the sky. So to your question. We have been able to predict control formation since the 1940s. This is called the Schmidt Applement Criterion. I met a guy and he's in my telegram chat, T dot me slash clown of your chat. If anybody wants to meet him, his name is Jeff, you can go ask him yourself. Jeff was a Navy meteorologist. He worked on an aircraft carrier. His job specifically was to tell the guys on that flew the plane. Avoid these regions where you're going to make white stripes in the sky, which are going to give away the location of our freaking aircraft carrier. During World War II, B70G, B70G flying forces were flying bombers over Germany, leaving big white stripes behind them. And they had they were driven by propellers. So make that big sense. If Kim trails is a new phenomenon, it's only happened just recently. Then something's not guiding here, at least according to me, because I'm looking at the big picture here. And once I understood what the Schmidt Applement Criterion was, that there are the specific conditions called ice super saturated regions, which will determine whether a control is short, whether a control is long and linear, and then evaporate, or if it sticks around. If it turns into a serious cloud, now, if you look up Kim trails or geo engineering, you're going to read a lot of stuff about this. And there's going to be a lot of conjecture and a lot of people pretending to be scientists. I am not one. I'm just a nerd and I remember what I read. But Jim, let me interrupt here. And just on behalf of our audience, nobody in our audience is saying that every control is a chemtrail. And I fully agree with that. Right. Right. Because the common trail is a normal phenomenon that you are describing the physics behind that. But what some people would say is that there are other cases where there are substances mixed with jet fuel or there are sprayers on planes. I think that's what can address that. Yeah. I can. And that's the purpose that's why I created KimTrolFacts.com. Because I've collected at this point, I think I have 120 examples of bump pumps and pipes. And I'm just going to go straight to, like at this point, we can't have waited. In the dimming thing, we can show some pipes that are sticking out of the back of the plane. It's the only example in this two hours of film that he has where he shows pumps, two little pipes. Those pipes are on an airbus A319. They are pylon drained. I actually have the patent. You can go to KimTrolFacts.com right now. Bring it up on the screen if you want to see it. So the patent from airbus, so they were not retrofitted nozzles. They were made in the factory. They are four engine fuel or oil leaks that happen in the pylon, the nissile to keep it from exploding. I actually interviewed some people who work on the flight line. I just to verify this myself. Personally, I said, dude, is this actually what this is? He's like, yeah, I mean, you take your finger, you stick it up there. If you feel oil or gas in that little hole, then that plane is not taking off and we got to go in there and we got to figure out what's going on. So that's one example. Well, there's 120 other examples. Pretty popular one shows back like a C130 and it's got these big pipes sticking out the back and these huge trails. Well, people go, well, that's proof of my KimTrol's. No, it's not. That's actually a Malaysian C130. The Malaysian flag in the American flag was pretty darn similar. But I go and I go to archive.org or I bring up the original website. And I'm showing this to a friend. It's a mutual friend. We both know him. Because he sent the picture to me. I said, dude, that is salt, water, cloud seeding in Malaysia in a C130. Here's the original article that the picture came from. And he's like, well, damn. And then he sends me another pump and pipe. And I'm like, that's the modular aerial spray system from young stock, young stock, Young stock, air reserve base, aerial spraying you. It is a sprayer. It does have pumps and pipes. They do adult aside, so they spray from ski those. They spray oil dispersants out of it. Once again, C130. So how would they disperse carbon black dust in a powerful form? Or what? How is that exact? So with Dr. Florence van Stratton, when she did it in 1958, she said that she was able to suspend it in a liquid and just dump it out of the back of a, you know, like a C130. They just let the back down and they put some liquid and make some carbon black dust in it and make a string. And it made a stream of clouds. And they came along right back through the same clouds. And they dumped powdered no water, just powdered form of it. And all of those clouds disappeared. It goes back to the wild seeding or overseeding. If you have too many particles and not enough water vapor, then the water droplets can't get big enough to fall on the ground. So when you oversee the sky, there's not enough water vapor available to make a cloud that's going to rain. And that's what they were able to do in 1958. So very similarly right now, we've had so many changes. And what, the reason why we have so many lines, the reason why we have so many cross hatches, zigzags and all everything in between is because they reduced something called the, the RSVM reduced serve, um, vertical separation minimum, RBSM. And what it did was before planes had to stay 2,000 feet apart when they were flying when they passed each other. And they said, you know what, we're going to reduce that to 1,000 feet. So now you can compact more planes into the area, which is filled with ice, super saturated regions, each plane, when it burns a leader of jet fuel, produces 1.24 liters of water. So you generate more water than you actually burn fuel, make that make sense because see, you know, it's, it's, it's H2O, so the hydrocarbon hydrogen plus oxygen coming into the engine reduced water. Yeah, water vapor out of the atmosphere. But it's also making more water than was there originally. And so you're actually super saturating the air up there. And then you're put introducing a stream of black carbon, which is not carbon black like we were talking about earlier. There's two different things. They're chemically distinct. One is black carbon, like carbon black is like 95% elemental carbon, whereas black carbon is like burn wood. Um, or you burn jet fuel. So black carbon gets coated in graphing, gets coated in sulfuric acid, and contains aluminum barium, strongty, and vanadium, lived in them copper, nickel, lead, magnesium, manganese, and the list goes on. Um, Abigail and Etal 2016 study, chemical characterization of freshly emitted particles with mass spectrometry. Anyway, so all those chemicals are in the jet fuel. Because it was in the crude oil, it wasn't refined out, and it produces, in 2019, the Gaia studies said that 44 million pounds of nanoparticles were produced by the airline industry. That's 280 septillion nanoparticles. During 2019, just that year. So what we're seeing in the sky is atmospheric conditions mixed with jet fuel emissions, but that's not it. And everybody likes to call me generally the jet fuel guy. They missed the other point. The other point of the Abigail and paper was that they also detected engine lubricant oil in the stream. So the oil, the lubricant. That's in the stream as well. Also, erosion of the engine itself, because some of those metals were not detected in the fuel, but they were components of what the engine was made from. When you're up at flight altitude, there's a lot of radiation, and there's something called the Wigner effect. Have you ever heard of that? So this is basically radiation causes the breakdown of metals, it causes it to erode. So you've got these high bypass turbo fans, which when every time, and you can go ask anybody who works on a flight line about this, what are they doing when they check the plane, when it's on the ground, they're looking for micro fractures in one of those fan blades. Because they're constantly eroding, they have to be replaced. Internal engine parts, they're always eroding. These are excellent cloud condensation nuclei. So the long story short of this is, all of these particles are coming out of plane, and in the right conditions, they're going to form serious cloud. I don't want to say, Kim trails are controlled. I call them plane-fart, but in the end of the day, once the plane-farts are in the right condition, they're going to make cloud. Here's the rub. People want to call it climate engineering. They want to call it geoengineering. They want to call it specifically stratosphere, aerosol injection. This drives me bad shit crazy. Because, if you fly into the stratosphere, you will not create a cloud. And that is because there is a temperature inversion that happens at the tropopause. The tropopause is the dividing line between the troposphere, where all the weather we see is, and the stratosphere, where the ozone layer and all that is. The reason why geoengineers want to put chemicals into the stratosphere, stratosphere, your solar injection, is to whiten the sky. It will not make cloud. It will make the sky look milky white. These are your sky look milky white. Todd? Sometimes. Hold on, but the stratospheric aerosol injection, that's a term used by the government itself, as you know. And that's to make the sun reflect off of the stratosphere, and the reason they choose the stratosphere is so that it stays a lot. Right? Those particles stay a lot of the resonance. Right? The higher you go, the resonance time is longer. Exactly. They want to dim the sun. From our point of view, they want to dim the sun. But from outside the planet's point of view, the planet would look wider because it's reflecting more sunlight back off of those particles in the sun. Right? Because of what's called Riley scattering. That's the reason why the sky is blue. But if you put a whole bunch of other chemicals up into the stratosphere, that's called me scattering. So this would actually look white from the ground as well. It would whiten the sky from the ground if there was stratosphere, aerosol injection happening. Well, guess what? Mexico banned geoengineering. And David Keith, nobody knows this name. Everybody knows David Keith? No. It doesn't ring a bell. Okay. But keep the short. Because we're we're almost. We're going to wrap it up. Yeah. I remember the names now, and I want to give this in here real quick. Mount Pinotugo Robbs, 1991. Makes a whole planet cooler. Low wood, Roderick Hyde and Edward Teller. That's Dr. Evil and the father of the hydrogen bomb. Lawrence, Laura Livermore National Labs in 1997, came up with the idea of stratosphere aerosol injection, which was based on an earlier idea called Budico's Blanket by Mikhail Budico, like in the 1960s. So this popularized the current push for stratosphere aerosol injection. King called Derrick comes into the scene. Models, what the geoengineered world would look like and they're being a Paul Cretz and the Nobel Laureate says, Hey, this could work and we're off to the races. So now you got universities. You got all these scientists all over the planet talking about how they can block the sign, either with space, you know, mirrors or stratosphere aerosol injection, brain cloud brightening all these ideas. Now here's the rub. David Keith and King called Derrick were Bill Gates, you know, the guys who handed out Bill Gates money to the budding geoengineers who wanted to study this stuff. David Keith, whenever Mexico ban geoengineering, he said, I don't think you can really ban geoengineering because putting, you can't write legislation that banned putting sulfur into the stratosphere because commercial aviation does that every single day. And that's the truth, because jet fuel as a fuel sulfur content, which is why we've written an EPA petition for rulemaking to basically tell the EPA, hey, if you can do it for the trucking industry, if you can tell diesel fuel creators, you got to go from 500 parts per million sulfur down to 15. Then why is the airline industry allowed to use carousine with up to 3000 parts per million sulfur? When I did the calculations, we're talking about 747 billion pounds annually of sulfur dioxide that is reaching the stratosphere, which is whitening the sky because it's also filled with the black carbon, with the metals, the aluminum, the barium, and all the other metals are all going into the stratosphere. Anytime a plane is flying there. You say just, wow, just from commercial aviation or general aviation that's happening right now, that much sulfur is going into, you said, I'm gross stratosphere estimation. Wow, that's huge. And there reminds me of the old rule of lead in gasoline. Also, used to be lead in gasoline, right? There's also still lead in prop plane fuel. It has a ton of lead in it. They just recently tried to get rid of, they just passed regulations. It's called an endangerment finding that tetraethyl lead and avgast should be removed. So they're phasing that out now. When I testified in front of the EPA in Washington, D.C. and 2015, I razz them on C span about, hey, you're ignoring all the people who've been bitching about the lead in the, you know, piston planes. You're up here trying to regulate greenhouse gases coming out of a plane. No, we care about planes making clouds blocking the sun and could just stop doing that and maybe do something about the metals. Great. What we're doing right now is we've got an EPA petition for rule making. You can learn about this at climateviewor.news. That's my sub-stack. There's two articles up there right now, where you can read our petition. Go to American CleanAircoilition.org. You know, it's me, Renette Sennum, Lesley, Menukian, Michael Hogan, a great sayerjig, Global Wellness Forum. We've signed this petition. I spent, you know, 20 years learning this stuff, writing it down into this petition, to tell the government, look, we're tired of you guys right there. There's, the fight against geoengineering and the other ones right out there taking Kim trails to court. We're, we're doing so well for the first time that nobody has ever done. A lot of people have been talking for 20 years about Kim trails. The difference is, I wrote a, you know, with the help of some friends, wrote a petition that is 39 pages long with a hundred and seventy scientific, you know, citations in it. And we submitted it to Leselden because when make sunset, this geoengineering start up was throwing balloons in the sky. He went on Twitter and you saw it, Mike, I saw your responses and Dan said the same thing. Why is Leselden complaining about a dude throwing 220 pounds of sulfur into the stratosphere? I mean, I get, there's a drop in the fire. Yeah. It's nothing. We're covering the airline industry, putting almost a billion pounds of sulfur into the stratosphere. So this is where we're holding their feet to the fire. If I could, if I could just paraphrase and summarize here in the interest of time, what I think you've just said here, which is pretty profound, is that all, all of the jet fuel emissions have metals, they have sulfur. So all of them are in essence, but not necessarily deliberately. It's just that they're burning fuel, crisscrossing the skies with this fuel. Sometimes it appears, based on barometric pressure, whatever ice, nucleation, whatever, sometimes it's invisible, but it's always there. It's always toxic in some way in the aggregate. Is that, it's actually worse than what most people think, because most people think, if I don't see the lines, it's a no spray day. But the truth of the map, these chemicals are still getting dumped into the stratosphere. The Indian Space Organization found 10,000 black carbon particles per cubic centimeter at 18 kilometers. That is in freaking saying that 60,000. 10,000 black carbon particles, the only source of which could have been aviation fuel because it was spherical. It was covered in graphite, it's the only place it could come from. The northern hemisphere is chemically distinct from the southern hemisphere. A percent of commercial aviation occurs in the northern hemisphere. The stuff that's in my petition is groundbreaking. Nobody's ever, and the fact that people aren't talking about it is even more mind-numbing for me because I've always said the truth is scarier than fiction. If I were the airline industry, and I had avoided being regulated. Since I was created, I would make up the Kim Trail conspiracy just so that people did not focus on my problem. Interesting. Interesting. What is the petition? I mean, what are you trying to achieve there? We're asking them to reduce jet fuel sulfur content to 15 parts per million. This will reduce the atmospheric load in the stress field. It will stop the stress field aerosol injection of sulfur by the aviation industry through the tune of 42 million flights per year. Geoengineer said they only needed 14 planes of geoengineer to the whole planet. But we're ignoring 42 million flights per year, but I 2050 that's expected to double. Is there any mechanical reason why the manufacturers of the jet engines say that they need sulfur in the mix for engine reliability or anything? That was for the engine health. They've made the argument that it's a lubricity improvement. We don't take all of the sulfur out because it helps with erosion. The whole thing would... That whole argument falls apart when you realize that that same hearing that I went to in 2015, the Obama administration canceled that hearing and said, I'm going to sign a deal with China, the ICO, and the European Union to use sustainable aviation fuel, biofuels for control. Biofuels... They have many different sources but one thing they have in common is, they're zero sulfur. They've been flying... They've been testing biofuels for 15 years now. They've been transatlantic flights that run on 100% sustainable aviation fuel, zero sulfur. No engines got destroyed. So sell that to somebody who didn't know about any of this. It's absolutely BS. That's why we're asking for this. The second thing that we're asking for is mandatory control avoidance. We can tell where the ICO procedurator regions are in the sky. They're not everywhere. It's not that dang hard to avoid them. Detecting them with modern AI and all of the things that they're already using a pallet here just got a contract to route all the flights. I don't know if that makes you feel better or worse. It certainly doesn't make me feel any better. But if pallet here in their AI are going to be running all these Google AI just partnered with American Airlines and did some transatlantic flights where they were able to avoid high-super saturated regions and reduce control formation by 69%. So if they can do it with a little bit of Gemini and some United Airlines on a test then why aren't they doing this at scale? We are demanding our blue skies back. We've been able to do the military does as you think that the B2 bombers that went over and dropped those bunker busters in a ram were even big white stripes behind them. I don't know they weren't. So we have the technology. We have the ability. This is what we are demanding from the EPA and in turn, once the EPA says, yes, this is visible pollution. That's all they have to do is making a danger in finance. You know what? But sulfur in the stress here is pollution. And so is the cloud these planes are making. The FAA will be required by law under the Clean Air Act, which is what we're doing. We're using the Administrative Procedure Act to petition the government using the Clean Air Act to clean up the damn airline industry. And if they don't, then we can sue them. Unlike what we've got. Gem, who should have veto power over an experiment that affects everyone under the sky? No body. No body. God. Okay. That's my answer. Let God control the weather, not man. We are not responsible enough to do this. I hear you. And who owns the sky? Gem. God. Exactly. Right? Unless you live in New York City and then apparently like 50 feet above your head people sell that by the acre. Yeah. The stupidity of our, you know, like capitalism is great. You know, we would not be sitting in air condition in the rooms talking each other on an internet without capitalism. But there is a point where it goes past stupid and disaster capitalism, weather derivatives, betting on the weather, all of the stuff that's going on. And now we have private companies that are venture capital startups for geo engineering. We have got to get ahead of this and start talking about the real problems as soon as possible before it's too late. And that's my role is to focus on the real and be pragmatic and try to come up with solutions. Well, my take is that if God made the weather and I'm pretty sure he did, how big must the technocrats egotistical balls be to try to edit his work. Right? I mean, that is the whole, the whole premise of technocracy is a scientific dictatorship that controls all resources, whether it's water, earth or human. Right? So the only reason they abandoned climate change because it was a way to control people is because now they have AI. And now climate change ain't so bad, even Bill Gates said, you know what, climate change ain't not so bad. We're not going to die because they found a better way to control people. True. True. It's a technocratic human. We are, we are over time here. But wow, this has been really fascinating. We've all learned a lot. Jim, let me give you about your website again. Climateviewer.com is one of them. And what was the other one about chemtrails? It's chemtrailfacts.com. And like I said, that's still a work in progress. I've got miles to go on that. But if you go to connect.climateviewer.com, that'll show you three of the full websites I have plus my sub-stag YouTube, eggs, and all that stuff. Here we go. Join our telegram chat. And you know, if I do everything open source AF, so if you appreciate what I'm doing, join my Patreon, sign up for sub-stag. I will greatly appreciate it. I'm trying to buy a, you build a studio in my backyard. So one day I can look at sexy as Mike does here on the camera. And not be in my bedroom. Be able to make videos more often in program. We couldn't tell. I mean, your background looks great. Actually, your lighting is good. It's all good. I'm doing the best I can. Bubblegum inductance. No, you made a little great. You should see some of the stuff that we deal with with other guests. It's pretty crazy. But this has been great, Jim. Thank you so much for joining for your time. I showed you website all those three sites you mentioned. And then Todd and I are going to come back for the after party discussion. We'll take a quick break, folks. And just stay with us. We'll be right back with the after party. Stay with us. Join the official discussion channel for this show on telegram. At t.me slash decentralized TV, where you can ask questions or offer suggestions of who we should interview next. Also be sure to subscribe to the email newsletter on decentralized.tv where you'll be alerted about one day in advance of each new upcoming episode before it gets published. On decentralized.tv, you'll also find links to our video channels and social media channels across all platforms, including Brighton, Rumble, Bitshoot, Twitter, Truth, Social, and more. Check it all out at decentralized.tv. All right, welcome back to the after party. Folks, wow, Todd. That guy has a lot of knowledge in his head. And he's, I mean, clearly he has looked at this for many years with a great mind and a lot of detail. Yeah, you know, I think when others say move along or the government says move along, Jim says, actually no, hold my beer. Let's zoom in for 100%. And I just love that. You know, I mean, he's a fact collector. And very, very discerning. I learned a lot. I mean, it, you know, it makes sense. And I want to resist. I want to resist with all my heart and soul. That this isn't some big conspiracy theory where they are trying to just say, it's exactly as out of existence. I mean, if indeed it is, it's the first time I heard that there are these areas that you could route around to where Kim trails are just going to naturally occur if a regular jet flies through. Right. I mean, clearly these areas, it's based on, you know, a barometric pressure or air density as we call it in ballistics, you know, moisture level, water vapor, all these things. These areas move around. So they have to be, I think, dynamically detected and avoided if, if there's an effort to avoid them. Yeah, because I, initially when he was talking about that, I'm like, yeah, no, Jim. I mean, I remember the sky was blue all the time when I was a kid. And they were still flying jets through there. And to this day, some days you go out. And it's just beautiful blue. And you still see planes that are flying through. So I had never heard that the, the, these centers are like an amoeba. And that they just move along and that one day those same 10 flights can fly through there, like clockwork and you see nothing and the next day they're creating these Kim trails. And the, I'm open to it, but, but, you know, that's my point. Well, what, what's the, the takeaway that I got from this interview. And let me back up because, you know, I, my lab tests for heavy metals. And so I started a lot about heavy metals over the years. And we know that, for example, around small community airports where they use a lot of avgas. And the, the lead concentrations in the land near the airport are much higher than farther away from the airport. So, you know, I'm, I'm trained as a small aircraft pilot. So, you know, you, you, you fly a pattern around the runway. You come in to land, you know, with a certain pattern kind of like a giant rectangle. And so your fuel that you burn, which has led in it is going to tend to settle on the approaches. And the, the takeoff exits. You know, the, the, the right, right, the compass direction of the runway like runway one seven is at 170 degrees on the compass. So those lead patterns are going to line up with 170 degrees on the compass. And it turns out, that's, that's all true. So, what our guess said today that made sense to me is that really he's saying that all jet fuel is toxic. Yeah. All of it. Mm-hmm. You don't have to spray anything because it's being combusted and released. Right. Right. And it's got sulfur and it's got other, you know, metals. Some of them have you, whatever, lots of different metals. Some, some toxic, some not, but you can imagine the dispersion of that. Sure. Being very wide. Yeah. Yeah. I can look up in this guy and see this exact and based upon what Jim shared. I can reconcile that pretty easily. But what I also appreciated was his education on cloud seating because there are the technocrats out there that are trying to modify the weather. And it sounds like for profit. You know, like, like for us a weapon. Yeah. It's a weapon. Kind of like, you know, absteen getting video with his special guests, you know. And then using that to blackmail them. It's like, this is just a different kind of blackmail going to these cities or oil companies in the Gulf and what now that's just nuts. But that he seems to say is definitely a thing cloud seating and geoengineering. So, you know, and I'm still interested in geoengineering, geoengineering governance. I mean, because it's like, what good is it? If these people can just run these experiments way above our heads? I mean, it doesn't just piss you off that they could, they could steer a hurricane like. Well, yeah. I mean, among the other things, you know, the use plan of earth as a giant. Petri dish for their map science experiments, right? Yeah. And we all have to try to survive it. Whatever they're doing with freaking, you know, spike proteins or heavy metals or pesticides or the stratosphere. We're trying to dim the sun, you know. Yeah. And look, you know, if the sun gets dimmed, do we at least get a utility rebate, Mike? I'll tell you. You know that the power grid is starting to fail. The eastern grid. But over the July 4th holiday, a coned announced rolling reductions in voltages to hundreds of thousands of customers across New York City. They reduced their voltage from the 115 typical residential voltage for single phase electricity. They reduced it in some cases to 86 volts. Wow. Like, another client was only an 8% reduction, but it was actually a 25% in many areas. So they're they're turning down the voltage, which means you can't run computers, right? Wait. Yeah. Help me help me understand that. So you're saying that 25% of the homes and businesses in New York City went through a period over the weekend of not 25%. There's hundreds of thousands of homes. Oh, I'm sorry. And this is what this was announced by coned, by the way. Okay. It's all in their press release. They reduced the voltage. They claimed by 8%, but it was actually 25% in many areas. So you're paying for 115 volts. Yeah. You're getting 86. But that degradation is the difference to where you can not only run your air condition. You can't run that computer. I can't run computers on 86 volts. You can run like old motors will run slower. In condescent lights will run dimmer. You know, a lot of sort of older electrical consumption devices will run at with lower consumption. Wow. Not modern electronics. They have to have certain voltage to the power supply in order to function. So they're basically turned off all your computers. That's not getting last very long. I mean, it can't last. You're paid a lot. Right? I mean, they did it. It announced. They did it. And what kind of. I mean, I didn't see that news. Oh, yeah. Yeah. I did an infographic on it. You did. Oh, the weekend. Yeah. It was a big deal. Rolling blackouts. Actually. Where'd that go? That's nuts. Yeah. Let me bring it up here. Okay. Here it is. This infographic. Rolling blackouts are here. This is from ConEd. And they turned down. Here it is. 86 volts is what some customers ended up with. And then there was also an alert by PGM. The interconnection for the east grid. 67 million customers were hit by emergency declaration of PGM saying they're going to have to start turning off data centers. And that's why Trump was telling everybody to turn up your thermostat to stop using as much air conditioning. Whoa. Yeah. That's what I said. That's what I said. That's what I said. That's what I said. That's what I said. That's what I said. That's what I said. That makes all the sense in the world on, you know, on a week in that has record highs. Yeah. People are going to die from, you know, save our data centers. Kilgramma. It was peak demand on the grid and the grid. Yeah. The eastern grid is at its limit. Good. And so, you know, I don't know what this has to do with chemtrails, let's say. But at some level, it's all interconnected. And the fact that they use climate change to try to get people to stop using power. Now they're going to use, you know, black out, just just, oh, we're out of power. Good luck. That's why you're going to have to use these typewriters over here. See? Remember my typewriter? Yeah. Yeah. Use a zero volts, zero voltage right here. This sucker doesn't need any electricity. Wow. Yeah. Black out proof. You just know that all of these controversial topics are going to eventually become a documentary narrated by Morgan Freeman, I think. We, right? We should only hope. He's got a great voice for that. But so, what do you think of the interview that we just said? What's your takeaway? Well, I, I learned something in that, and it makes sense, is that every jet that flies over my head is spewing fuel that is poisoning the sky in its own way, right? What I had no idea was that there are certain areas where it would fly through and those, that same flight could go through the same area, and it'd be completely blue sky and not appear. That I have to do a little more research on, and I want to. I want to understand what these areas are. You know, so that's my homework, Mike. What about you? Well, the takeaway to me was that all jet fuel, was that all jet fuel is pollution. Yeah. Which makes sense. But I was really shocked by what he said was the calculation of how many pounds of sulfur are emitted into the atmosphere because of commercial aviation. And also there's a lot of military aviation right now. Trump's flying, you know, like seemingly burning an unlimited amount of jet fuel to fund this war with Iran, good point. Right. Right. And take it all the fuel when we're in the middle of an energy crisis and, you know, what are the implications of the military polluting the skies? Yeah. Man. Yeah. I just want to go back to the 50s. But you weren't there. I know. I know. I know. My grandpa was thinking about me. I think I don't know. But. Yeah. It's nuts out there. But I do have to say, I'm going to stand firm on this ever since I installed my little cloud buster back there. I have had blue skies. Okay. I don't know what that does. But it has totally impacted my. My. Operating reality. Well, maybe based on what we learned today, maybe that device changes the threshold where controls. Ah. Good point. Maybe. It's a great point. Yeah. As it spews out its negative ions. That's about the only thing I know about it is that it spews out the negative ions. If people are interested in that Mike and I did an interview with the. Oh, yeah. In venture of this and I think you should go back about it. You know, 1012 episodes and watch it. It's fascinating. And we have an update coming on that device, by the way, because we're working on something. Okay. Yeah. But anyway, we're going to have an update for you. But maybe that's how that works. Maybe it. It connects with, you know, ionization in the sky. Yeah. And alters. The area. To where that zone where it doesn't create that zone that is prime for. Chemtrails or what we alleged to be chemtrails to form. Yeah. Yeah. That. That may be it. Could be right. Yeah. But it doesn't necessarily. It doesn't mean that. You know, if the planes are flying over, they are still exhausting. Yeah. That's right. That's right. Right. Maybe it's impacting that area that he said that, you know, you could fly around. Maybe it just dissipates that whatever that. I don't know what that one is. You know what the easiest way in the world is to clear the skies of jet contrails is start a war with Iran and have a jet fuel shortage. There you go. That's like. I mean, airlines are already canceling flights in some countries because of that. We've seen that out of Australia, for example, in in other countries. Yeah. If the straight doesn't reopen, I mean fully reopen, which it's not. No. Then there's going to be a global jet fuel shortage that will become very real. It will. Yeah. I mean, I don't mean that all the planes can't fly. But airlines are going to have much more difficulty acquiring fuel economically. And they'll be cutting flights left and right. Oh, yeah. Well, and the flights that you can get are going to be relatively unaffordable. Yeah. Exactly. You know, fuel surcharges and things like that. Yeah. Unbelievable. More people will be driving. And by the way, you know, full self-driving vehicles. Now, like Tesla are so advanced that driving is much easier on road trips. And I have a big announcement here. Okay. It's funny. Since I started talking about EVs, which and I don't even have one yet. Yeah. I probably will. But since I started talking about EVs and the need to be self-reliant. And I'm setting up, you know, a solar charging system here. Now, four of my employees have purchased Tesla Model-wise. Okay. So when I pull into my parking lot here now, there's like, it's like a Tesla sales lot or something. Wow. It was like, are they happy with them? They love them. They love them. And on top of that, I talk with my team. We are going to set up a Tesla charging station. Actually. Two stations here so that our employees can refuel for free by driving the work. How great is that? Yeah. Cool. Yeah. It costs us, but it doesn't cost them. Yeah. That's a nice company perk. That's a nice perk, right? Yeah. It makes you a little hard to go to work. Yeah, right? Absolutely. Like, oh, I better not call and sick today. I need to recharge my vehicle. Yeah. Right? That's perfect. Yeah. That's perfect. Yeah. And plus we have commercial rates for the power here. So it's cheaper. Great. You know? So it's like, why not? Why not let the employees charge their car. Yeah. Great. And it's all my fault because I started talking about EVs. So that's why this has happened. It's okay. Keep driving around, driving down everybody's expenses. You know, Tesla should pay me a commission. Yeah. I should be an affiliate of Tesla. They should give us credit. Because I'm selling like accidentally selling so many of their vehicles to my own employees. That's great. So funny. But anyway, there are. Look, there are a number of cool things that we've all learned about over the last few years. That can help us accomplish things like, you know, EVs. Now you can charge from sunlight. You can have your own fuel from the sky. Yep. So you get to keep the energy you harvest. Yep. And then you have, you know, what's the sponsor of the show, your website, my 575E, bring it up, allows you to keep more of what you earn. Amen. So it's not like sunlight from the sky. It is. When you keep more of what you earn, protect what you have and decrease your personal liability. Those are three legs to the UNA school. And I have to tell you, Mike, we've had a real break through over the last couple of weeks. And that, yeah, it's just, you know, I've helped over 700 people acquire these. And what became very evident to me, especially of late, is there are certain people who have a little more complicated business structure needs or sophisticated business structure needs. And we've actually put together a team to be able to assist those who might want to have a more macro strategy, like if they have LLCs, C corps, S corps, how these UNAs can really, what do they call it, keep, keep you know who from piercing the veil. And I have learned so much over the last couple of weeks, being being the participant on lots and lots of way more in depth. Zoom calls to where we're unpacking this macro strategy. And it was a lot to learn more about that. Yeah, yeah. No doubt. No doubt. We should do that. I can sponsor a Zoom call with these couple of people that are expert in this. One person is a fractional CEO who, you know, guess it. It's kind of a funny story. This gentleman got his own UNA 18 months ago and what I noticed was in our private telegram group. All of the sudden people who had LLCs or different business structures. This gentleman named Jason, he would just come in and he would help them and assist them and everything. And then finally about two months ago, I reached out to him. And I'm like, Justin, can we can we chat? Who are you? And I realize that he is a fractional CEO for six major companies worldwide. And it has just been put on his heart. You know how I talk about this is my form of activism, same with him, except he knows how business entities work and he has crat figured out the UNA, the power of the UNA, that the turbo charges everything from behind from in the private. How you can have your LLC or your business be forward public facing, but get all of the protections that the UNA offer. So I just, I just want to throw out into the universe if you are a person who has, you know, and the other thing is if if you're a landlord. Man, if you have multiple properties, then there is an amazing strategy to be able to make sure that it's, it's mind boggling. Wow. So let me give you website here, my 575E dot com as where people can click, let's go, they can sign up, they can learn about this, they can, they can pay a small fee and actually do a consultation with you. That's right. And they get it back if they move forward with the UNA and most people do, you just deduct that from the investment of the UNA. So it makes all kinds of sense to just simply book a consultation with me. Okay, that's cool. And then for you, you said the fractional CEO team, is that like 516's or like what kind of fractions are at work there? But he's 610's right now. 610's. Well, he works with 6 different. No, it's just, it's just that, you know, he's, he's in demand. And I understand why after talking with him, and then what we've developed over the last couple of months, because I just, I just flipped the script and I'm just like Jason, you're helping a lot of people in the group. Can we, can we organize that a little more? So that makes total sense. Yes. So if I'm having a consultation with somebody and I'm discerning that, hey, maybe you should take it to the next level. To be able to, you know, just have have, have another consultation. And it's not any additional fees to be able to, to pull him in and, and another person. So I'm just throwing it out there. It's, it's, we are always trying to improve. And the more and more that I am needy pin this. Man, oh, man, this entity is so powerful. Yeah. It's just so powerful. Okay, well, folks, I encourage you to check this out. Especially if you own gold and silver if you own crypto if you own real estate, if you own the business, especially if you're a copy of it. if you're a W to earner if you're a W to earner a 1099 earner if you operate an LLC own property trade and crypto. Stack golden silver if you have children. If you're interested in a generational way to be able to transfer assets. book a consultation with me. We can chat about it. If you breathe oxygen, if you have a heart beat, I mean, it's like almost, almost everyone fits. Almost everyone's. Yeah, if you can fog him here, you might want to book the consultation. Yeah, definitely. Okay, so that's that's great to hear. And I look forward, I'd love to sit in on a, on a, on a Zoom chat. I want to learn about it too. Also then from my side, I want to mention rangerdeals.com and, you know, this company right here, limitless peptides, they have a 15% off sale happening right now for a few more days. And you can use our discount code ranger for another 15%. Whoa, you can save 30% because they stack the discounts on BPC 157 and CMAX and some of the other favorites that I've used, you know, very successfully over a year and a half now, especially with the BPC for healing old injuries and things like that. And here at rangerdeals.com, we have discounts on the affiliate deals from Battalion metals, a very, very tiny discount. Basically, they wave the shipping insurance fee because they, they, they can't discount gold and silver. This is already, you know, very narrow margins. But there's savings on, uh, necessary certified organic CBDA hemp extracts plus the red life devices, the pet Macton VP dot net satellite, satellite phones here, and so much more. Because I was just going to share that I have started the protocol of using the nest's CBD oil. Yeah, every morning, a syringe, every evening syringe had to get used to the taste a little bit. But um, we know syringe, you mean, like a dropper? Yeah, the dropper. So, okay, yeah. Yeah, it's like, yeah, where are you injecting it? And that's sorry, the dropper. Okay. And, and, and, uh, I can tell you that I'm sleeping better. Oh, yeah, it's known for that. Yeah, yeah. So, uh, and the BPC 157, what is your protocol on how to properly take that? Uh, BPC 157. I use it internationally. Okay. So I just do like one one squirt in the nasal passages in, in the morning, just once a day. Oh, just once a day. Yeah. In the morning. Yeah. And that is the job done. That's all I have ever done with that. Except when my, when my sinuses are stopped up, I haven't been using it. Right. It's just too much other stuff in the way. Yeah. But normally, it's just like one spray in the morning. Okay. Excellent. Yeah. Yeah. Same thing with CMAX. Right. It's down. Yeah. These are some really good discounts and, and very, very rare to have discounts like that. Yeah. All right. Well, you know, wait, I, uh, Todd, I want to thank you for your time today and also want to take our audience and let them know that all the other episodes are available at decentralized.tv. And you don't want to miss the episodes because they're, they're all fascinating. Not just today's. Nope. And they are timeless. You know, there's relevant today as they were three years ago when we interviewed Jim Gail about. Yeah. And I'm, I'm still stunned by Randall Carlson showing us the media impact on the sun and how it blew this mask in the whole ejection out the opposite side of the was in that crazy. I'm still, that still haunts me because I'm like, okay. So wait a minute, earth doesn't have to be hit by a meteor. The sun could be hit by a meteor and it could blast this coronal ejection into earth's path. Yep. So that's what Randall was saying like solar events can melt ice caps on earth. Talk about a great ride the gap. You know, yep. Yep. Yeah, that was such a great interview. Like all God had to do was throw a rock at the sun. And then there's a great flood on earth. You know what I'm saying? I don't think I missed that part in Genesis. No, I'm, I'm pretty sure it's on the Genesis chapter six. Yeah, you stay in a spitwood to the sun and God clobbered the sun with a giant space rock and then there was a flood. Jesus pitching practice. Come here. Yeah. But isn't it wild? Like I was always just thinking about impacts on earth. And I wasn't thinking about impacts because I thought the sun is so huge that it would just eat whatever you throw at it. I would think. That's what I thought. He showed differently, didn't he? Well, apparently makes you wonder too. Like the sun must be less sort of liquidy. You know, like that it's more solid to allow all that kinetic energy to travel through to the other side and blow out the other side. It's like shooting a watermelon with the 36, you know, and then the back end of the watermelon blows out. That's what happens to the sun. Yeah. Wow. Okay, Mike. I think you need a paired comparison on the ranch. You need to get a 30 odd six in a slow motion camera and that's a little water melon. That's all right. No, I think everybody already did that researching the Charlie Kirk situation. So yeah, good work. I'm not going to do that. But in any case, sorry, it started to start to distract you with that. But I was I'm just shocked. Like we have so many amazing guests. And even the things we learn on the show, they stick with me. Yeah. Yeah. And people haven't seen anything yet. You know our guest lineup. Yeah, we have some pretty cool guests coming on. Amazing. Yeah, that's for sure. Okay. All right. Well, until then, Todd, have a great rest of your day. Thanks, Mike. Get that voice. 100%. It's sound and yeah, you sound like you're 98%. It's close. Yeah, it's close. All right, Mike. Have a great one. All right, you two. And thank all of you for watching. Again, check out all the episodes at decentralized.tv. Thanks for watching today. Take care. Cheers. Stock up on the long-term storeable Ranger Bucket Set. 536 servings of clean organic superfoods for your survival pantry. Certified organic and lab tested for purity. Order now at healthrangerstore.com.